Project | Replacement of Dynamics GP Financial Application |
---|---|
Project No. | AOS-2024-003 |
Location | Columbus |
Description | This is a Request for Proposal by the Auditor of State (AOS). AOS is soliciting proposals from financial management application vendors (vendor) to provide a replacement to our Dynamics GP financial application used to track staff project time for the purpose of generating billing for our audit and other services as well as generating a payroll file for the State of Ohio OAKS system. Specifically, AOS is requesting each vendor provide both the product and continuing support for the product. |
Proposal |
Review the RFP (pdf)
As mentioned in the RFP, this project includes an Applications Questionnaire.xlsx |
Status | Bidding for this project is open. |
Submit Bid |
Questions and answers will be added and updated below as they are received.
Send your questions to BidQuestions@ohioauditor.gov
We currently have a 33 concurrent-user license for the GP application, broken down as follows:
We have 850 users who use our own developed Timesheet application that does not have a license cost.
We have 850 users who use our own developed project viewer for all information regarding a project; it does not have a license cost.
This document will be shared individually upon request.
We do not have a score line item for an Ohio presence. This plays a role if funds are requested from the legislature controlling board. The submission process requires us to specify only if the vendor is Ohio-based or not.
If there are integrations that can add value with our Microsoft infrastructure, it will be considered.
We will consider both cloud and on-premises solutions. Integrations with reading and writing data for developed applications is a requirement in the spreadsheet. If a cloud solution is proposed, we would prefer a gov-cloud solution, but the minimum requirement is that the data centers are in the United States.
Yes to the first question and No to the second question. To explain further, the AOS is currently using a custom in-house application that tracks time both for projects and for payroll that all employees use. It uses GP Project data to list available projects and cost categories that employees can charge to. The data from this application is then integrated into GP for project tracking and billing proposes, but a separate in-house application uses that data to create a payroll integration to be sent to OAKS (the State of Ohio ERP for payroll processing). The AOS does not process its own payroll. The AOS has approximately 4,000 new projects per year with roughly 10-15 cost categories per project.
Yes, if the built-in timesheet in the ERP can be modified to accommodate the requirements of our timesheets, it would be preferable. If not, our AOS timesheet would have to be rebuilt to integrate with the proposed ERP using API services for the cloud or possibly direct sql for on-premises solutions. At this point, we would still evaluate if we would rebuild it in-house or contract with developers.
Your examples are currently satisfied by the State of Ohio OAKS system. However, we do need basic employee information — personal info including hire/rehire dates, position, department, and 10 additional custom fields. GP has an employee maintenance screen that we use for employee core info; then there are two buttons with an additional 10 custom fields.
There is no requirement for this. The AOS does not process payroll; the State OAKS system handles that.
About 300 to 400 employees submit for travel, hotel, and meal reimbursements every bi-weekly pay period.
Financial reporting is not within the scope of this project. For reports involving project tracking, we use Microsoft SQL Reporting Server.
Financial reporting is not within the scope of this project. We could provide a list of project reports if requested.
Biweekly payroll file and travel expense reimbursement file sent to the State of Ohio ERP OAKS.
We currently have limited use of one-time customers, establishing a new customer record when necessary for unique one-off projects.
These one-time customers are currently treated and managed the same as recurring customers.
This item was mistakenly included in the requirement template.
This item was mistakenly included in the requirement template.
Our office does not currently accept credit card payments but may do so in the future.
We have added custom text to our monthly statements. We want the ability to change the text in the future.
We generate an aging report for 91-plus day collections.
Reminder emails are automatically generated. At a month, personal calls are made for collection.
We do not have a process currently but may develop a strategy in the future.
Through budget vs. billing comparison reports.
This item was mistakenly included in the requirement template.
This item was mistakenly included in the requirement template.
Budgets are set up based on dollar amounts as well as hours.
Though rare, our office has offered either discounts or refunds in the past.
A credit memorandum is issued to the customer’s account.
They are tracked at the customer level, not the project.
We do not do promotions.
75 gigabytes.
Items that were inadvertently included in our requirements spreadsheet will be removed by the Auditor of State's Office for all submissions.